Sensitivity. Nothing irks me as much as a violation of human rights.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Das Kapitalism

In a recent article on Capitalim and Socialism titled Transition From Armchair Idealism, Siddharth thrashes down America and of course offers oodles of praises on socialism. This posting actually went onto become the most read article with 28 comments, the highest I have seen. I wrote a comment too and later, especially after reading the rest of the comments, decided to write a piece myself. There were two ideas presented in that piece, America is bad and socialism is good. I'll write about America a little later. Now about socialism versus capitalism.

Here I go.

Myth: The free market capitalism is evil and here rich get richer and poor get poorer.
Me: Capitalism is not all milk and honey. But what is the alternate we have? Socialism? Communism? Me choosing the free-market economy is very much like people in Tamilnadu voting for the better of the two evils. While saying this, I don't claim capitalism to be so evil. This is the best and most natural economic system we can think of. The derivatives such as blended-economy and welfare-driven capitalism are trash and meant only for politicians. Communism is evil and primitive. The result is evident with USSR and the Berlin wall collapse. And some of the horrendous stories we read from there.

Myth: The left in India are actually bringing a social balance and check to the society.
Me: As elsewhere, Communism is one of the dangerous things happened to India, next only to J&K terrorism. In our own backyard, West Bengal, the most intelligent society in India is in a pathetic state economically. Bengal would have continued to be a guiding light to rest of India had it not embraced communism. I still can't believe that in a state where Tagore, Mohan Roy, Vivekananda and Ray and countless other geniuses lived, the per-capita income is half of the rest of India (leave Bihar out). And today, you'll see more malayalees in Dubai than you do in Cochin. Communism has actually succeeded in driving out hoards of people from their own state to other 'promised lands'. People shudder at the thought of setting up their business units in Bengal and Kerala. We all joke about malayalees running tea-shops everywhere and there's even a joke about Neil Armstrong, upon landing the moon, finding a tea shop there. But the reality is not all that funny. I have travelled to Kerala and seen the situation myself. If this the balance that the left are bringing in, well, I prefer to remain unbalanced.

Myth: Thanks to the Left that the petrol price is under control and various other pro-rich schemes being taking off.
Me: Yeah, thanks to them that the petrol price is under control. And PF interest rate is being kept in check. And various public sectors are not being disinvested.

Well, what is the result? The world petrol prices have gone up, and we are still selling the petrol in controlled rates. Which means the government is actually 'paying' more money from its exchequer. So whose money is it anyway? The taxpayers. Please remember that you and I are actually paying the additional 'hike' money but didn't know it. Not just the salaried knowledge(!) workers. Every individual who buys vegetables to soaps to TV.

The government pays 9.5% interest on PF. They want to reduce it and they can't because left would object. And today anyone with elementary economics knowledge will know that if someone were to earn 9.5% interest, the lending should be on more than 9.5%. In today's dwindling interest rates, the government certainly can't lend money for more than 9.5%. So how do they pay you 9.5%? The government subsidises your interest! Where does that money come from? Your tax of course. interestingly, the Left actually wants to hike the PF percentage to 12!

And the PSUs that are prevented from being disinvested are also being run on your money because most of them run under loss for years and for even those making profits, the profit margins are far less than they actually should be.

The result! The money set aside for developmental and infra-structure projects are being routed for subsidising these things. Recently I read that the BP and IOC, the petroleum giants are pulling out their oil exploration initiatives because they don't have funds for R&D anymore. Their cash reserves are being re-routed to make up for the loss due to world oil price hike.

So that's the result of heeding to left. Our own Fortune 100 companies lose their cash reserves. The growth and self-sustenance plans of these companies are put on hold resulting in long-term loss. And very soon our tax money will go in subsidising them so that they can subsidise our petrol! Your and my money which is supposed to be used for better infra-structure is being ciphoned off so that you can appreciate the left next time you go to a petrol bunk. Did any one ask why your fringe-benefit tax went away? Did anyone ask why the inflation went up post UPA government? Did anyone ask why no money has been allocated for half of the infrastructure projects announced in the budget?

You have the answer.

2 Comments:

Blogger Siddharth said...

to start with a few clarifications...my article is one where i think out loud and honestly confront some contradictions in my views/lifestyle as i see them...it is more the views of someone who is a little confused searching 4 clarity...while i make my dislike 4 totalitarian capitalism obvious...ur claim that I state blindly that “ socialism is good” is a gross misrepresentation of my views…

u talk of the Berlin wall collapse…do u know that the german economy is in shambles with unemployment rates at an all time high?…do u know about the socio economic divides within berlin/germany between the western and eastern sides?why hasn’t capitalism which u seem 2 think has magical solutions for all questions been able 2 do anything abt this?

Where have I said I am a blind supporter of socialism? u seem to forget that in an earlier article I called the chinese govt the most barbarian regime since hitler’s.

The media,our education system and everything around gives only one side of the story…if u have studied what people like vatsan and I had the privelage of studying in environmental studies at school ur worldview will be totally different…maybe u should meet my es teacher Arun Anna…or I will get hold of some of the stuff we learnt in environmental economics and u can have a look...

8 June 2005 at 15:55

 
Blogger ada-paavi!!!! said...

the arguement is not capatilism vs socialism\communism this agruement is dead, only those who dont know how the world economy functions hold onto such arguements, for someone who knows economics the arguement is how best can capatilism meet the needs of the social secotr, communism is dead. 'marx is relevant as a question not as an answer'
in the 70s inspired by USSR communists in india did stupid things. and are now paying the price. they are still a party searching for an idealogy and role. in short they are going through an identity crises.

when it comes to pertrol prices a reduction in duties wud suffice. the cost per litre of petrol witout taxes and all is merely RS 25 (including transport) it is the so called capatilist patries who tax this sector, reducing duties wud suffice

i support the left on disinvestment. why disinvest loss making PSUs which have a good business model? LN Mittal built his fortune on turning around loss making PSUs, why cant the govt do that? the valuation for such PSUs will anyway be miserable so why not try and turn them around? secondly income from disinvestment is capital income the government treats it as revenue income and hopes this will ease fiscal situation, so i am glad this hasnt happened. nxt time govt wants to ease fiscal situation will it sell RED FORT?(assuming all PSUs have been sold)??
only problem with the left in india is that they are holding up a few crucial reforms (FDI IS NOT 1 OF THEM, i dont want india to be WALMARTISITED)

the revamping of the EPFO, which still uses single entry system because largest defaulters are from left ruled states and this remains hidden in single entry system.

labour reforms crucial for indias economic growth is being blocked by the left.

the role of the left is to see to it that india doesnt become another chine with wide income disparities, for this they need to be appreciated, (china is not a communist state)

the underlying question which all economicts face is how best can capatilism work to meet the social sector needs? a free market capatilism wont work because the market doesnt possess a self adjusting mechanism (this was proved by keynes)

in blore wipro wants the govt to lay the approach road, the govt says that htey have no money and want wipro to share the costs which wipro is refusing to do. the logic is that thebenefit will accure to wipro and therefore they can share the costs. this is what capatilism has created. companies which have no sense of social responsibility. something the TATA's have plenty of(a product of socialism)

'individual interest not equal to social interest' or 'individual well being not equal to social well being'
capatilism believes that individual interest is equal to social interest , tis has again been proved wrong. its notlike capatilism is without its faults (ur arguement seems like capitalism is faultless and perfect)which it is not.

8 June 2005 at 15:55

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home