Sensitivity. Nothing irks me as much as a violation of human rights.

Monday, August 29, 2005

Service and public sectors

Image sourced from http://www.ukindia.com

Everyone knows that I'm an ardent advocate of privatisation. Though many evangelists of public sectors can't push their defense powerfully against us, they always think they win over a point. That public sectors are socially inclined, which means they are 'service' minded as against the 'evil' minded profit-driven private sectors.

For instance, who will loan those poor farmers but the public banks, who will run buses to those remote places but the public transports, etc.,

I saw one movie last night which made me think heavily on these lines. I was idly flipping channels and suddenly, when I moved to DD National, the unmistakable frame made me stop there. Pather Panchali was being screened in DD National. I stopped surfing and started watching. It was around 11.15, and I guess I must have lost around half-hour of the movie. Nevertheless, I sat on.

Alas, the joy didn't last long. I had seen the movie several times before and I remember most of the dialogues. The one I saw in DD didn't have proper dialogues. Subtitles kept skipping and often they were wrong. And I don't know what was wrong with telecasting, but half-inch of the top and left portion was cut, so you can't see the faces of the characters if they were standing. And the subtitles were plain white so if there's a pale background in the movie, the subtitles vanished, making it difficult to read. To make things worse, the huge blue logo of DD stood like a monster at the top left corner against the faded film print as a constant irritant.

The version I saw earlier was a DVD from Sony Classics. It was digitally remastered so the picture was crystal clear. The subtitles are well-timed to sync with the dialogues and were clearly understandable. The letters in the subtitles were given a soft brownish yellow outlines so that they didn't merge with a pale backgrounds. And there was no other logo or anything so you could clearly enjoy the movie.

While I said all that I understand very well that one had to dish out $16 for that flawless copy while the DD version was beamed to you for free. But I wonder what's the use of beaming it for free if no one's going to use the service? I have seen that movie several times before and I know how valuable it is. Even I found it very difficult to sit and watch the 'free' version. Then imagine a someone who's being initiated into Satyajit Ray? I can bet that the person can't last five minutes into the movie.

This arises out of carelessness, arrogance and disrespect. I don't believe that the people in DD beamed the movie because they respect it. I believe they didn't have anything else to do. In the bad old days DD used to play Nirod commercial during long breaks. Now the breaks are getting longer because DD isn't getting quality content from elsewhere and hence I suppose Pather Panchali has replaced the Nirod ads.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

General Wesley Clark Guest Blogs at TPMCafe
General Wesley Clark Guest Blogs at TPMCafe Army General Wesley Clark is guest blogging this week at top liberal community blog TPMCafe .
Hey there, you've got a great blog here! I'm thinking of bookmarking your site!

I have a fuji film digital camera site. It pretty much covers fuji film digital camera
related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

30 August 2005 at 06:02

 
Blogger Siddharth said...

sridhar,dd is still the nations most reaching telivision network.again,u & i are not the target audience.the sony DVD's have a target audience which is small and elitist.but dd wants 2 conciously promote the works of creative ppl in india.

just the other day i was watching an interview of shobana,the dancer and actress in podigai.at the end of the interview she praised dd for constantly promoting indian creative people and culture.star plus,sun tv,etc are more interested in what lipstick karina kapoor wears.

can u mention can programmes like vayalum valvum in our private channels?of course i watch the private channels more than dd and would rather watch pather panchali in the sony dvd version.but that is because u and i have that option.more than 70% of indians dont!

30 August 2005 at 06:05

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perfect 10 vs. Google Over Porn Infringement
Perfect 10 vs. Google Over Porn Infringement GooglePark: Scoble Goes to Google It's your weekly best of Weblogs, Inc.
You have a Great Blog! If you have time see my ##small business opportunity## related site. enjoy! It pretty much covers ##small business opportunity## related stuff.

30 August 2005 at 06:45

 
Blogger ada-paavi!!!! said...

privitasation is illogical economically as well as financially, capitalincome is flowing into the reenue account.

30 August 2005 at 17:38

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am sure you are an ardent advocate of privatisation, you chose to represent the indian CD's price in $!!!!

1 September 2005 at 21:20

 
Blogger Kanishkaa said...

Siddharth is spot on.DD has the greatest reach in the rural areas and stuff so its best that we stick to our DVDs if we can afford to.and DD's coverage of cricket matches..pathetic for us quality conscious people but a blessing for several others.private channels have recently agreed to share the feed with DD(once the rights are finalised) and it makes me happy because there will be nobody complaining

2 September 2005 at 20:14

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home